Am 25.05.2010 16:27, schrieb Chen Lei: > The package under reivew is actually Mixed Source Licensing Scenario > rather than Multiple license scenarios. Nonetheless, even in the guideline about mixed source licensing scenarios I can't find anything about omitting one of the licenses in the License field. In the given example, all licenses are mentioned rather than merged. I'd understand that (GPLv2+) + (GPLv3+) = GPLv3+, but (LGPLv2+) + (BSD) = LGPLv2+ seems strange to me. Why omit BSD and not LGPLv2+ then? Regards, Martin -- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging