Re: Multiple license scenarios

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am 25.05.2010 16:27, schrieb Chen Lei:
> The package under reivew is actually Mixed Source Licensing Scenario
> rather than Multiple license scenarios.

Nonetheless, even in the guideline about mixed source licensing 
scenarios I can't find anything about omitting one of the licenses in 
the License field. In the given example, all licenses are mentioned 
rather than merged. I'd understand that (GPLv2+) + (GPLv3+) = GPLv3+, 
but (LGPLv2+) + (BSD) = LGPLv2+ seems strange to me. Why omit BSD and 
not LGPLv2+ then?

Regards,
Martin
--
packaging mailing list
packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging


[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Big List of Linux Books]     [Yosemite Forum]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux