It may be better to draft a guideline against dependencies on redhat-lsb. In my opinion the purpose of redhat-lib is
just making fedora an LSB compliant distribution that proprietary softwares such as opera, adobe reader can run in fedora or other LSB compliant distributions with system-wide dynamic libs instead of linking static libs.
just making fedora an LSB compliant distribution that proprietary softwares such as opera, adobe reader can run in fedora or other LSB compliant distributions with system-wide dynamic libs instead of linking static libs.
No packages in official fedora repo really need reqiure lsb package.
Regard,
Chen Lei
On 2010-03-17 06:07:36，"Till Maas" <opensource@xxxxxxxxx> wrote： >On Tue, Mar 16, 2010 at 03:51:25PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote: >> As a followup to FESCo ticket 346 (https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/346), >> FESCo would like the Fedora Packaging Committee to draft a guideline against >> dependencies on redhat-lsb (and its potential subpackages). The idea is > ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ >> that appllications in Fedora should be packaged to use the Fedora native >> tools, not their LSB equivalents. > >I understand the comment from Kevin at "03/16/10 21:11:09" that it would >also be ok to require potential subpackages once redhat-lsb has been >made more granular. > >Regards >Till
-- packaging mailing list packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
