Fedora Development Discussion

• Thread Index

• Golang review swaps
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Fedora 31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Adopt new Go Packaging Guidelines
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Brandon Nielsen
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Akarshan Biswas
• Fedora 30-20190412.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190412.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Java packages FTBFS/FTI on 32-bit arches
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Jos Vos
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
  • From: Jerry James
• Fedora 30-20190411.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Jerry James
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190411.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Branched 20190411.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Charalampos Stratakis
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Przemek Klosowski
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Steve Grubb
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Michael Cronenworth
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Paul Frields
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Roberto Ragusa
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Przemek Klosowski
• Re: F30 live images still contain dbus-daemon package, anaconda-core requires it ?
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Autoconf help: missing X11 dependency
  • From: Lukas Zapletal
• Re: Autoconf help: missing X11 dependency
  • From: Lukas Zapletal
• Re: Autoconf help: missing X11 dependency
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Autoconf help: missing X11 dependency
  • From: Tomasz Torcz
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Autoconf help: missing X11 dependency
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Autoconf help: missing X11 dependency
  • From: Lukas Zapletal
• Autoconf help: missing X11 dependency
  • From: Lukas Zapletal
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Michael Watters
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Steve Grubb
• Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Brian (bex) Exelbierd
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: auto-starting libvirtd on Workstation
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: F30 live images still contain dbus-daemon package, anaconda-core requires it ?
  • From: jkonecny
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Vojtěch Trefný
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: dlib update
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-04-11 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Lukas Ruzicka
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: jfilak
• Node.js packages now provide v8-devel
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: F30 live images still contain dbus-daemon package, anaconda-core requires it ?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: F30 live images still contain dbus-daemon package, anaconda-core requires it ?
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: F30 live images still contain dbus-daemon package, anaconda-core requires it ?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Geoffrey Marr
• Re: dlib update
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: dlib update
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Brian (bex) Exelbierd
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Re: Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Michael Watters
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• How to fix dnf segmentation fault (zchunk metadata is re-enabled)
  • From: Jonathan Dieter
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: dlib update
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Martin Kolman
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Brian (bex) Exelbierd
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: dlib update
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Martin Stransky
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• F30 live images still contain dbus-daemon package, anaconda-core requires it ?
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Damian Ivanov
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Anyone seeing udev failing to start in Rawhide?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Julen Landa Alustiza
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: auto-starting libvirtd on Workstation
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• dlib update
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Peter Hutterer
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Brian C. Lane
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• Fedora Rawhide-20190409.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30-20190408.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Richard Hughes
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Cole Robinson
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Cole Robinson
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Richard Hughes
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Cole Robinson
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Fedora Rawhide-20190409.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190409.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Raphael Groner
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: Martin Kutlak
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
  • From: Jerry James
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Basic graphics mode / 'nomodeset' testing request, round 2
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Justin W. Flory
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• OpenVPN 3 Linux client - v5 beta release
  • From: David Sommerseth
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Raphael Groner
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Re: Please revert the python-impacket package removal
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: Registering Python packages with Anitya and the "no-monitoring" option
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Benson Muite
• Planned Outage - Fedora Core Services 2019-04-10 21:00 UTC
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Planned Outage - Fedora Staging/Proxies Updates/Reboots - 2019-04-09 21:00 UTC
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Registering Python packages with Anitya and the "no-monitoring" option
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Benjamin Tissoires
• Updating/rebuilding of coin-or packages
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Registering Python packages with Anitya and the "no-monitoring" option
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Re: Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Paulo César Pereira de Andrade
• Introduction for gaming packaging/maintaining
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Introduction for new maintainer
  • From: Karsten Andreas Artz
• Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Fedora 30-20190408.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-04-08)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires
  • From: Vit Mojzis
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: python-zstd?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190408.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• Fedora Rawhide-20190408.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: HEADS UP: Pytest 4 in rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190408.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Rawhide issue with python3-wxpython4
  • From: Steven A. Falco
• Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-04-08)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: python-zstd?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: python-zstd?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: jfilak
• Re: python-zstd?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: python-zstd?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: hg + zstd packaging
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: python-zstd?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• hg + zstd packaging
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• python-zstd?
  • From: Neal Becker
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: jfilak
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: jfilak
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Could not execute import_srpm
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Peter Hutterer
• [PSA] %meson contains -Db_ndebug=true
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• HEADS UP: Pytest 4 in rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Orphaning rubygem-sprite-factory
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Re: Registering Python packages with Anitya and the "no-monitoring" option
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Registering Python packages with Anitya and the "no-monitoring" option
  • From: Charalampos Stratakis
• Re: Rawhide issue with python3-wxpython4
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190407.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Registering Python packages with Anitya and the "no-monitoring" option
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Fedora Rawhide-20190407.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaning packages
  • From: Alain Vigne
• Re: vanishing abrt logs
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Fedora 30-20190407.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190407.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Rawhide issue with python3-wxpython4
  • From: Steven A. Falco
• vanishing abrt logs
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Need volunteer for a Go review
  • From: Hirotaka Wakabayashi
• Fedora 30-20190406.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190406.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Need volunteer for a Go review
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Orphaning all my packages
  • From: Jens Lody
• Fedora 30-20190405.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190405.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Obsoleting LuxRender by luxcorerender
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Branched 20190405.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Fedora 30 Final blocker status mail #1
  • From: Ben Cotton
• [Test-Announce] 2019-04-08 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] Proposal to CANCEL: 2019-04-08 Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Catch 22 in epel7 for %selinux_requires
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Obsoleting LuxRender by luxcorerender
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta Silverblue Feedback
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta Silverblue Feedback
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Obsoleting LuxRender by luxcorerender
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: luxcorerender failure to build
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta Silverblue Feedback
  • From: John Harris
• Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
  • From: Robert Scheck
• Fedora 30 Beta Silverblue Feedback
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: luxcorerender failure to build
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Sergio Durigan Junior
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Sergio Durigan Junior
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Sergio Durigan Junior
• Re: luxcorerender failure to build
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Please revert the python-impacket package removal
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: luxcorerender failure to build
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Please revert the python-impacket package removal
  • From: Michal Ambroz
• Re: Maintainer test instances
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Maintainer test instances
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1
  • From: Richard Shaw
• luxcorerender failure to build
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Using %verify and %ghost and other issues for mass cleanups
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
  • From: Tomas Krizek
• Re: Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Package Naming Guildelines for compat-lua packages
  • From: Tomas Krizek
• Re: f28/f29 container composes failure since a while, is it already tracked by an issue ?
  • From: Clement Verna
• f28/f29 container composes failure since a while, is it already tracked by an issue ?
  • From: Normand
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Ingvar Hagelund
• DevConf.IN 2019 Inviting Speakers - CFP Open
  • From: P J P
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-04-04 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190403.n.1 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190403.n.1 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Heads up: OpenColorIO 1.1.1
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Planned Outage: Taskotron 2019-04-09 16:00 UTC
  • From: Tim Flink
• Modularity question for packagers about rolling/latest/stable/master streams
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Fedora 30-20190403.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190403.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Martin Stransky
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: Add internationalization support to "Command completed." string.
  • From: Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Can someone do this quick Golang review please?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Fedora 30-20190402.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: EXTERNAL: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Wells, Roger K.
• Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Sven Lankes
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190402.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: EXTERNAL: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: EXTERNAL: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Wells, Roger K.
• Re: EXTERNAL: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: EXTERNAL: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Wells, Roger K.
• Re: firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Martin Stransky
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Richard Shaw
• firefox-wayland and URLs in other programs
  • From: Hans de Goede
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Fedora 30 Beta Release Announcement
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: John Reiser
• Fedora Rawhide-20190402.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190402.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Orphaning packages
  • From: Kiara Navarro
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Lukas Ruzicka
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Sphinx and xindy
  • From: Jerry James
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Orphaned packages to be retired
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora Atomic Host Two Week Release Announcement: 29.20190401.0
  • From: noreply
• Re: Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal: Gating Rawhide - Single package updates
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Blocking criteria proposal for F30+: Printing
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora 30-20190401.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora 31 System-Wide Change proposal:
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190401.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Modularity UX Questions
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Tom Stellard
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190401.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Fedora Rawhide-20190401.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Schedule for Monday's FESCo Meeting (2019-04-01)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• [HEADS UP][SUDO] changing default sudoers file
  • From: Marek Tamaskovic
• Re: Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• [Review needed] oidn package
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: John Reiser
• Re: dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• PSA: workaround for segfault when running dnf update in F30
  • From: Jonathan Dieter
• Re: provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: VirtualBox 6 and Vagrant in Fedora 29
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• clang segmentation fault on armv7hf
  • From: Richard Shaw
• dnf crashes make fedpkg / mock unusable
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190331.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Fedora Rawhide-20190331.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• provider bad repo (network) or bug development ?
  • From: Cătălin George Feștilă
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190330.n.3 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Fedora 30-20190330.n.3 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• VirtualBox 6 and Vagrant in Fedora 29
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Branched 20190330.n.3 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• [Test-Announce] 2019-04-01 @ 16:00 UTC - Fedora 30 Blocker Review Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• [Test-Announce] 2019-04-01 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Need assistance to build luxcorerender due to boost
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Christopher
• Stewardship SIG: Initial report and plans for the future
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: John Florian
• Re: latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• latest rubygem-puppet-lint for F29 is from F23???
  • From: John Florian
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Robert Marcano
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Josh Stone
• Fedora 30-20190329.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Robert Marcano
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190329.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• Re: RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Tom Hughes
• RPM strip scripts and executables as shared objects
  • From: Robert Marcano
• Introduction for GSoC: Koundinya
  • From: Venkata Rama Koundinya Lanka
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: [stewardship-sig] Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Student Introduction
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Przemek Klosowski
• Re: Need assistance to build luxcorerender due to boost
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Anitya not working again?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Anitya not working again?
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Fedora Packaging Location & Symlinks Question
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fedora GPG signing/verifying question
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fedora Packaging Location & Symlinks Question
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: Fedora GPG signing/verifying question
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Fedora GPG signing/verifying question
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• mythes-eo package
  • From: Carmen Bianca Bakker
• Need assistance to build luxcorerender due to boost
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Mark Wielaard
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Mikolaj Izdebski
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: M A Young
• Re: LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Pavel Raiskup
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• LD_LIBRARY_PATH vs rpath and libtool
  • From: Ingvar Hagelund
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: pkgconfig usage
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Silvia Sánchez
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Orphaning python-Lektor
  • From: Sasa Savic
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: pkgconfig usage
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Orphaned some Java packages
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• pkgconfig usage
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2019-03-28 16:00 UTC)
  • From: James Antill
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: qrsBRWN
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: David Dykstra
• Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: sway SIG
  • From: Jeff Peeler
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Georg Sauthoff
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: J. Scheurich
• Fedora Rawhide-20190327.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20190327.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Orphaning python-Lektor
  • From: Charalampos Stratakis
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• rubygem-curb license change from Ruby to MIT
  • From: Pavel Valena
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Multiple Review Requests for one source package?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Lubomír Sedlář
• Re: Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• [Test-Announce] Re: Fedora 30 Beta Go/No-Go meeting
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Strange C++ error with GCC 9.0.1
  • From: Peter Lemenkov
• Student Introduction
  • From: Hemant Kumar Singh
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• strange failures with gcc-9.0.1-0.11.fc31.x86_64
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Non-responsive maintainer - Micah Roth
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Older Fedora AMIs to be deleted
  • From: Sayan Chowdhury
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Tom Hughes
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Jakub Jelen
• fedpkg clone lollypop ... Permission denied (publickey), after copying my fedora cert to new vmware with f30
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: New Golang Packaging Guidelines: Feedback needed and appreciated
  • From: Jakub Cajka
• Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Older Fedora AMIs to be deleted
  • From: Sayan Chowdhury
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: John M. Harris, Jr.
• Re: Is SELinux enforcing on the koji builders?
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nico Kadel-Garcia
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Wolfgang Ulbrich
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Jackson
• Fedora 30-20190326.n.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Packaging Question - Open Liberty
  • From: Michael Zhang
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Ralf Corsepius
• Fedora 30 compose report: 20190326.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Branched Report
• "Basic graphics mode" feature and criterion discussion
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Fedora 30 Beta 1.8 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• soname bump on libprojectM without announcement in rawhide
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• soname bump on libprojectM with announcement in rawhide
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Rex Dieter
• Policy regarding redundant dependencies
  • From: Georg Sauthoff
• Add internationalization support to "Command completed." string.
  • From: Peter Pan
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 30 Candidate Beta-1.8 Available Now!
  • From: rawhide
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: mcatanzaro
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: New Repo failed with "The Pagure project already exists"
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• New Repo failed with "The Pagure project already exists"
  • From: Christophe de Dinechin
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• ACTION NEEDED: Orphaned packages to be retired (Java packages in 1 week)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Michal Konecny
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot
• [Fedocal] Reminder meeting : Modularity Team (weekly)
  • From: nils
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jeremy Cline
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Tomasz Kłoczko
• F31 Self-Contained Change proposal: Include several modules in the EFI build of Grub2 for security use-cases
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Jason L Tibbitts III
• Re: Bugzilla (?) component for Fedora cloud images
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Bugzilla (?) component for Fedora cloud images
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Fork a 119MB pagure project to updating monitoring?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2019-03-25)
  • From: Justin Forbes
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Steven Bonneville
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: R P Herrold
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: New member on the block; Introducing Apprise
  • From: Chris
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Adam Williamson
• HEADS UP: PyYAML 5.1 in all Fedoras
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: New member on the block; Introducing Apprise
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Japheth Cleaver
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Review swaps (Golang packages)
  • From: Robert-André Mauchin
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Dridi Boukelmoune
• Re: [modularity] Bringing order to the confusing module stream and profile names
  • From: Adam Samalik
• Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen