Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



>>>>> "MH" == Miro Hrončok <mhroncok@xxxxxxxxxx> writes:

MH> You realize that once it is maintained by the group, nobody else is
MH> going to take it?

When the stewardship SIG maintains a package, it should be for the sole
purpose of keeping it around just long enough to avoid serious
disruption that would be caused by that package being removed from the
distribution.  The SIG shouldn't be maintaining things indefinitely and
should always give the expectation that the packages _will_ be retired
(not just orphaned again) unless someone picks them up.

 - J<
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux