Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 2/15/19 5:16 AM, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 2:14 PM Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> This group would be for maintaining packages that are modularized in a
>> non-module context so that it's actually usable by the broader
>> ecosystem. Modules are not usable for non-module packages, and third
>> parties building on top of Fedora can't use modules at all either.

That is indeed sadly true right now, but that should change.

>> Since module developers don't care about these users, this SIG will.

I don't think that's true.

> Exactly. This clarification is definitely more succinct than I
> anything I could have said.

Well, does that mean the stewardship sig will stop existing once we can
build non modular content against modules? I was seeing it as more long
term.

>> Fabio, I'm willing to help where I can with this, too.
> 
> Thank you!

I don't have much spare time these days, but feel free to add me to the
group/list and I can help as time permits.

kevin


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux