Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 3/25/19 8:02 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2019-03-25 at 12:59 +0100, Dridi Boukelmoune wrote:
>> And since RPM appears to be configurable for the
>> default interpreter, have it use /usr/bin/bash by default.
> 
> TBH, it seems to me reasonable that we just do this.
> 
> If our position is that we actually expect Fedora package scriptlets to
> be executed by bash and don't think it's a problem if they don't work
> when executed by some other shell, why not this make this clear and
> explicit in this way instead of having the default be sh, but then tell
> people sh must be bash?

Doesn't bash behave slightly differently when invoked as 'sh' ?

Long ago it used to, but I don't know if thats still the case...

kevin



Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux