Re: Announcing the Stewardship SIG: Maintenance for High-Priority orphans

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 27. 03. 19 11:07, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On a related topic, wasn't the orphan retirement process supposed to be amended, so that packages that still have co-maintainers will be assigned to one of those instead of being retired directly?

No. There was a quick kick of for this but it was turned down.
I personally am very against such proposals, as it makes maintained packages with plenty of "dead" maintainers almost immortal.

--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux