Re: Proposal: Stewardship Group / SIG for taking care of otherwise "module-only" packages

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



I propose to change the scope of the SIG a bit.

Maintaining packages could be one of the activities of the SIG, but its primary purpose should be to deal with this topic in general.

Watch for orphans, develop orphaning and retirement workflows, develop a strategy how to manage those cases, how to prevent them, suggest guidelines on how to decide whether or not one should move package to the module - topics like that.

It extends the scope, but it also opens some possibilities for us to work on the root cause.

What do you think?

-- 
Aleksandra Fedorova
bookwar

 
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux