* Stephen John Smoogen: > My very hazy memory of UsrMove was that one of the arguments was that > we were behind some other distros on this, and once again not "First". Huh. That surprises me. > I think the issue is that many of us look at the GNU/Linux ecosystem > in different ways. There is what is in existence now with the majority > of Linux being Android phones, and the majority of installed GNU/Linux > being old Debian releases running on lightbulbs and other embedded > hardware. However none of that is first, and being compliant with 10 > year old software is easy.. just never fix anything. We are very much > not compliant with those. Debian has those multi-arch paths, though. It really helps them with qemu-user, and it also simplifies cross-toolchains because they can use native libraries. I assume this makes Debian a much more attractive target as a developer workstation for targets where you can't build natively—but I could be mistaken. > There is the middle road, where you look and see a large number of > Ubuntu being used in the cloud or in containers or whatever the hyped > on technology of last month was. We are somewhat compliant with > these.. but not really. I don't think there's a significant difference between Ubuntu and Debian in these matters at present, just the usual version skew between packages. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
