Re: More than 10% of all Fedora spec files are not POSIX sh compliant

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 26/03/19 11:40 +0000, Tomasz Kłoczko wrote:
On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 08:57, Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
[..]

>What does this 42 means in this case? It means that during whole gcc build
>are repeated 42 times some subset of *autoconf tests*. How it was possible
>to loose that?!? 🤔
>gcc is quite monolithic and it should have only one configure.ac. Yes,

Why?


Really?
Really do you want me to answer on the question "why there is no any sense
repeat 42 times some tests on the source code configuration stage?" ??

Yes, because you repeatedly make the mistake of assuming that one
dimension of a problem is the only one that matters, and that all
other considerations are irrelevant.

I haven't quoted the rest of your email because it's the usual
rambling diatribe and I gave up trying to follow it.

_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux