Registering Python packages with Anitya and the "no-monitoring" option

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello,

I have worked on my script to register packages with Anitya this week-end:
https://gist.github.com/eclipseo/fbc52aeebccb7f560221bd40ec28b6af

It now handles all backend that Anitya supports.

I have ran it on Python 2661 packages and this resulted in 637 new packages 
being registered. Michal Konecny still needs to do something for the new 
hotness to pick them up.

However I already noticed that a large number of packages have set "no-
monitoring" in Pagure. A lot of that are old packages ported from pkgdb and it 
seems it defaulted to "no-monitoring" back then. As a results many bugs won't 
be filled even if the packages is outdated.

I wish we forbid the use of "no-monitoring" and force maintainers to track 
updates through Bugzilla, so updates are always linked to a bug number. So we 
would convert all existing packages from "no-monitoring" to "monitoring".
Any input regarding this proposal? Would many of you be against such a change? 
Right now we have tons of packages left unmaintained as a result.

Best regards,

Robert-André


_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux