Some modules now use "latest", "stable", or "master" as stream names for various different things. It's quite confusing and I want to fix that.
Without naming them, I see two different use cases:
1/ "for end users" — rolling stream meant for end users to consume, likely used in projects without traditional versioning scheme, or for the latest version that the Fedora's "cutting edge but not bleeding edge"
2/ "for hackers/preview" — pre-release or development builds not meant for end users to use in production, but mostly for preview, experiments, or for people who like to live dangerously
And I want a distinct name for each of those so people know what they're about to install. The Modularity Team can't agree on this [1], so we'd like to hear from other packagers what they think.
So the question is, do people agree there are two? Or just one? Or more?
Thanks,
Adam
PS: I know it's not always clear for packager which one to choose — for example with project only having a master branch — but in those cases I'd like to use packagers' best judgement to decide wether they feel its "for users" or "for hackers/preview". I trust Fedora packagers, that's why I use Fedora. And they know the thing they're packaging better than me. We would of course provide guidance that would help decide if necessary.
Adam Šamalík
---------------------------
Red Hat
_______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
