Re: Fedora, Packaging, Java, and Shrooms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Le vendredi 12 avril 2019 à 01:21 -0500, Ty Young a écrit :
> 
> Fair enough.Given that only Java 8 and newer is available via
> Fedora's 
> repos and things have calmed down a bit, is the complexity still
> worth it though?

You still have OpenJ9 vs OpenJDK, LTS vs non LTS, completely free
software build vs supported proprietary build (Fedora does not ship the
later but some Fedora derivatives do and there is a wish for them to be
able to do it without butchering the Fedora-inherited filesystem
layout).

So yes, it is probably possible for someone motivated to invent a
better java alternative setup, but it will be a lot of work, with a lot
of constrains (one of those, being able to upgrade existing setups to
the new system gracefully)

-- 
Nicolas Mailhot
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux