Re: Loopy rpm subpackages dependencies

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dne 28. 03. 19 v 13:57 Tomasz Kłoczko napsal(a):
> dnf does not provide any signing functions and I was not even aware that someone implemented in base dnf building
> functionalities (someone is using that?)

No, DNF likely does not user rpmb and rpms.
Both libraries has 21K + 15K. It is really worth the work? Note that the split will affect ~ 16 other packages in
Fedora. And likely some outside of Fedora. They need to be notified of the split, reconsider their dependencies. For
saving 36K?

Miroslav
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux