On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 3:44 AM Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Le 2019-03-25 22:47, Japheth Cleaver a écrit : > > If you can take a one-time hit to > > remove bashisms and get a 25-40% improvement, > > CPU time is cheap, packager time is not. Exchanging CPU time for "you > all should learn to write POSIX-only shell scripts" would be an awful > deal. The Java part of Fedora is slowly imploding right now because a > lot of people pushed their complexity on packagers, and the packagers > could not cope. The Fedora target should be to help packagers achieve > more with less work, not achieve less with more work. > > POSIX is dead as a shell compatibility target. You want to replace bash > with something faster, by all means do it. With something that includes > the GNU extensions like pushd/popd that most packagers expect today. Is there any reason to *ever* use pushd or popd in %build or %install today? _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
