Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Di, 09.04.19 19:24, Richard Hughes (hughsient@xxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> On Tue, 9 Apr 2019 at 19:21, Lennart Poettering <mzerqung@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> > Very similar is actually "fwupd", why does that need to run all the
> > time? Seems like something that should be bus activatable, and
> > exit-on-idle, but why run it all the time?
>
> It does exit on idle, if you don't have hardware that is tricky to get
> version numbers from. If we're polling for the list of firmware
> updates once per day we don't want to cause display flicker or that
> kind of thing. ThunderBolt and MST are the main offenders here. We're
> working on it, but it's not super simple.

Hmm? Can you elaborate? Why does fwupd's runtime have something to do
with display flickers? Not grokking the connection?

Lennart

--
Lennart Poettering, Berlin
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux