Re: Can we maybe reduce the set of packages we install by default a bit?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On Tue, Apr 9, 2019, at 12:07 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya,
> 
> today I installed the current Fedora 30 Workstation beta on my new
> laptop. It was a bumpy ride, I must say (the partitioner (blivet?)
> crashed five times or so on me, always kicking me out of anaconda
> again, just because I wanted to undo something). But I don't really
> want to discuss that. What I do want to discuss is this:
> 
> Can we maybe reduce the default set of packages a bit?

The dependency chain of libvirtd is just doomed from this perspective.  For Fedora Silverblue (and FCOS) we make the intention decision not to include it by default (though I personally have it package layered).


(Using qemu inside a container without libvirt is also a nice pattern, we use this in https://github.com/coreos/coreos-assembler )
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]

  Powered by Linux