On 3/29/19 2:58 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote: > Dne 29. 03. 19 v 19:47 John Florian napsal(a): >> I know it's not unusual to carry builds over from prior releases. My >> understanding is that happens because there was no mass rebuild. >> However, when I look at the F29 repo I see >> rubygem-puppet-lint-1.1.0-2.fc23.noarch.rpm. Was there really no mass >> rebuild between F23 and F29? This package is severely outdated -- >> upstream has v2.3.6 and v1.1.0 dates back to 2014. It looks like a >> build hasn't succeeded in Koji since F23. I don't know why because I >> don't see any build logs for any of these failures. I also was under >> the impression that FTBS packages like this get culled. >> >> Is my understanding buggy or did this leak through somehow? >> > You can see that all mass rebuilds failed: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=14781 > > And there are several FTBFS bugs reported (including closed due to EOL): > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=CLOSED&component=rubygem-puppet-lint&list_id=10071090&product=Fedora&product=Fedora%20EPEL&query_format=advanced > > Looking at the logs from the oldest bug: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1308068 > > I guess the origin of the issues is that it does not yet use > %gem_install macro and the rubygems `--rdoc` option was deprecated > around F24 time. And it looks like the maintainer is MIA in all that time ... not a single response: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1349208 -- John Florian _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://getfedora.org/code-of-conduct.html List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
