Fedora Development Discussion

• Thread Index

• [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200515.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: koji build of libqxt-qt5 fails on rawhide
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: [EPEL-devel] Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ondřej Lysoněk
• Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200515.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: koji build of libqxt-qt5 fails on rawhide
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Another libxc soname bump...
  • From: Susi Lehtola
• libqb soname bump
  • From: Christine Caulfield
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Till Hofmann
• Another libxc soname bump...
  • From: Susi Lehtola
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200515.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• HEADS UP: icu 67 coming to rawhide
  • From: Pete Walter
• Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Why we package Rust crates
  • From: Kushal Das
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200515.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Porfirio Andrés Páiz Carrasco
• koji build of libqxt-qt5 fails on rawhide
  • From: Martin Gansser
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Michal Srb
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Dominique Martinet
• Re: Why distributions package software
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200514.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Denis Arnaud
• Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Eduard Lucena
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Eduard Lucena
• Re: TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Todd Zullinger
• TeXLive 2020 landing in rawhide
  • From: Tom Callaway
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Dan Horák
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Denis Arnaud
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Denis Arnaud
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Denis Arnaud
• Re: How long to wait for a Bugzilla component to be created for a new package?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Why we package Rust crates
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Vascom
• Re: Boost packages conflict
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Boost packages conflict
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• How long to wait for a Bugzilla component to be created for a new package?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Should 'boost' metapackage install boost-python3 and boost-numpy3 now?
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Should 'boost' metapackage install boost-python3 and boost-numpy3 now?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Till Maas
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Documentation for EPEL modules?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Jared K. Smith
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Self Introduction: Aman Gupta
  • From: amangupta884036 via devel
• Re: Why distributions package software (was: Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG)
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Marcin Juszkiewicz
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Mamoru TASAKA
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Why distributions package software (was: Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG)
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ondřej Lysoněk
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200514.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Documentation for EPEL modules?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Michal Srb
• Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200514.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• CPE PO Office Hours on IRC Time Change: 1300 UTC on #fedora-meeting-1
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200513.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200514.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: ClamAV: quick security build needed
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200513.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Martin Langhoff
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Should 'boost' metapackage install boost-python3 and boost-numpy3 now?
  • From: Jonathan Wakely
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• Fedora-IoT-32-20200512.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Call for testers for rpmautospec in staging
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: FESCo election nominations are now open
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Josh Boyer
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200513.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200513.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Zachary Snyder
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Eduard Lucena
• Re: i3 new SIG
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• i3 new SIG
  • From: Eduard Lucena
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200512.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200512.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200512.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• ClamAV: quick security build needed
  • From: Marius Schwarz
• review requests/intent to unretire kpcli requirements perl-Crypt-ECB and perl-Crypt-PWSafe3
  • From: Chuck Anderson
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Kamil Paral
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Martin Langhoff
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Martin Langhoff
• Re: armv7l status?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• armv7l status?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Christopher Engelhard
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Solomon Peachy
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• ELN Reasons (was Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy)
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Fedora 32 system-wide change proposal: reduce installation media size by improving the compression ratio of SquashFS filesystem
  • From: Bohdan Khomutskyi
• Re: Orphaned 215 packages
  • From: Jamie Nguyen
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: David Kaufmann
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Kevin Kofler
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Orphaned 215 packages
  • From: Jamie Nguyen
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Tadej Janež
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Gerald Henriksen
• 4.4+ squashfs-tools in rawhide
  • From: Bruno Wolff III
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Philip Rhoades
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: E.N. virgo
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Orphaning rubygem-echoe
  • From: Athos Ribeiro
• Re: Non-responsive maintainer: pcpa
  • From: Athos Ribeiro
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: John W. Himpel
• Re: [fedora-java] Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Andrew Haley
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Benjamin Lowry
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Omair Majid
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Tom Hughes via devel
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: Clement Verna
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Lennart Poettering
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Tom Hughes via devel
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: [fedora-java] Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Igor Raits
• Retired packages with maintainers
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Severin Gehwolf
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: [fedora-java] Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Aleksandar Kurtakov
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Transitioning scripts relying on libcgroup-tools to the cgroup’s unified hierarchy (v2)
  • From: virgo
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Felix Schwarz
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ty Young
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Accounts disabled in Bugzilla (ex-redhatters)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: SEL: double restorecon on systemupgrade F31->F32
  • From: Petr Lautrbach
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Intent to retire python-blist, but it's "apparently" being used by python-ujson
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: Intent to retire python-blist, but it's "apparently" being used by python-ujson
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Luya Tshimbalanga
• Re: Intent to retire python-blist, but it's "apparently" being used by python-ujson
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Intent to retire python-blist, but it's "apparently" being used by python-ujson
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Fedora-IoT-32-20200511.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• FedoraRespin-32-updates-20200511.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Alexander Ploumistos
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump
  • From: Gwyn Ciesla via devel
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Gary Buhrmaster
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Dominique Martinet
• Re: SEL: double restorecon on systemupgrade F31->F32
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re-Launching the Java SIG
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Marius Schwarz
• SEL: double restorecon on systemupgrade F31->F32
  • From: Marius Schwarz
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: David Kaufmann
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Chris Adams
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Mohan Boddu
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200511.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Aleksandra Fedorova
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Gary Buhrmaster
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Proposal: Revise FESCo voting policy
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200511.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: James Cassell
• [Test-Announce] Proposing Fedora QA Global Onboarding
  • From: Sumantro Mukherjee
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Tom Hughes via devel
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: Clement Verna
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200511.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200511.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: qt5-devel dropped?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: qt5-devel dropped?
  • From: Vascom
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• qt5-devel dropped?
  • From: Susi Lehtola
• CPE Weekly: 2020-05-11
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Re: Pinging spin or labs maintainers in failed composes tickets
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Next Open NeuroFedora Meeting: 1800 UTC on Monday, 11th April.
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200511.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200510.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: QtCreator armv7hl build failure, gcc bug?
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Barry Scott
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Scott Talbert
• What is force erasing python 2 packages like moin?
  • From: Barry Scott
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200510.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Orphaned felix-framework, felix-osgi-obr-resolver
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200510.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Re: Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Igor Raits
• Announce soname bump of zipper library
  • From: Antonio Trande
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200510.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200510.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: RFE: fed-needs-rebuilding
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Non-responsive maintainer: pcpa
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200509.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200509.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Block discard on more things
  • From: John M. Harris Jr
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• RFE: fed-needs-rebuilding
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200509.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200509.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: cgnslib (libcgns.4.0 → libcgns.4.1)
  • From: Igor Raits
• [Test-Announce] 2020-05-11 @ 15:00 UTC - Fedora QA Meeting
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200508.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: cgnslib (libcgns.4.0 → libcgns.4.1)
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Tom Hughes via devel
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...
  • From: Nathanael D. Noblet
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: Stephen Gallagher
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200508.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Firewalld/nftable/libvirt...
  • From: Nathanael D. Noblet
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Samuel Sieb
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: J. Randall Owens
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Dan Book
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Dan Book
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: David Cantrell
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ken Dreyer
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Scott Talbert
• Re: Self Introduction: Hunor Csomortáni
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Fedora 31->32 dnf system-update experience
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Unannounced SONAME bump: cgnslib (libcgns.4.0 → libcgns.4.1)
  • From: Igor Raits
• Schedule for Mondays's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-11)
  • From: Igor Raits
• Re: QtCreator armv7hl build failure, gcc bug?
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• QtCreator armv7hl build failure, gcc bug?
  • From: Sandro Mani
• Re: Self Introduction: Purusharth Saxena (FAS: purusharths)
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200508.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200508.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Renaming pythonXY packages to pythonX.Y (e.g. python39 to python3.9)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Licence confirmation for tpcclib
  • From: Purusharth Saxena
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200507.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Ignoring non-Fedora notifications?
  • From: Kevin Fenzi
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Juan Orti Alcaine
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• [Test-Announce] Fedora 33 Rawhide 20200507.n.0 nightly compose nominated for testing
  • From: rawhide
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Jerry James
• Call for help: maven-verifier-plugin FTBFS with Java11
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Ian McInerney
• The future of Fedora community apps
  • From: Marie Nordin
• Review swaps
  • From: Juan Orti Alcaine
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Hunor Csomortáni
• Re: Self Introduction: Hunor Csomortáni
  • From: David Kirwan
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• CPE PO Office Hours Reminder - 1400 UTC Today om #fedora-meeting-1
  • From: Aoife Moloney
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Self Introduction: Hunor Csomortáni
  • From: Hunor Csomortáni
• Re: Review swap: psi-notify
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200507.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libglade-2.so.6() (glade)
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Re: Unannounced SONAME bump: libglade-2.so.6() (glade)
  • From: Kalev Lember
• PWG meetup May - the latest printing/scanning stack updates
  • From: Zdenek Dohnal
• Unannounced SONAME bump: libglade-2.so.6() (glade)
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Review swap: psi-notify
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• Self Introduction: Purusharth Saxena (FAS: purusharths)
  • From: Purusharth Saxena
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Simo Sorce
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Non-responsive maintainer: jfch2222
  • From: Christian Kellner
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Leigh Scott
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Review swaps
  • From: Ankur Sinha
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Christopher
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Dan Čermák
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Can we distribute modular .repo files in a separate package?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200506.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miroslav Suchý
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200506.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Cătălin George Feștilă
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200506.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Carlos Mogas da Silva via devel
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Jared Dominguez
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Michel Alexandre Salim
• RE: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Mark Pearson
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Review swaps
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Iñaki Ucar
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: [External] Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Proposal: Add "Feedback" section to change proposal template
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Robbie Harwood
• Re: games group in comps
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Fedora+Lenovo
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: games group in comps
  • From: Matthew Miller
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Stephen John Smoogen
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Justin Forbes
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ondřej Lysoněk
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Neal Gompa
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Daniel P. Berrangé
• Re: F32 s390x: ICE: attempting to access a gcc command line option that is not stored in global_options
  • From: Kalev Lember
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Adam Williamson
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200505.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: <sys/sysctl.h> will disappear from rawhide glibc soon
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Stewardship SIG Orphaned Nine Java Packages
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: <sys/sysctl.h> will disappear from rawhide glibc soon
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: F32 s390x: ICE: attempting to access a gcc command line option that is not stored in global_options
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: <sys/sysctl.h> will disappear from rawhide glibc soon
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• F32 s390x: ICE: attempting to access a gcc command line option that is not stored in global_options
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Simo Sorce
• FESCo election nominations are now open
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Leigh Griffin
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Michael Catanzaro
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Ondřej Lysoněk
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Colin Walters
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Richard W.M. Jones
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: clime
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Jakub Jelinek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Peter Robinson
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Stephan Bergmann
• Re: CPE Weekly: 2020-04-26
  • From: Guido Aulisi
• sorting of git N-V-R tags in rpm package repositories
  • From: clime
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security
  • From: Miroslav Lichvar
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Petr Pisar
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200505.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Panu Matilainen
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Igor Gnatenko
• Fedora rawhide compose report: 20200504.n.0 changes
  • From: Fedora Rawhide Report
• Re: Aarch64 build failure: hidden symbol `__aarch64_ldadd4_acq_rel' in /usr/lib/gcc/aarch64-redhat-linux/10/libgcc.a(ldadd_4_4.o) is referenced by DSO
  • From: Sérgio Basto
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Chris Murphy
• When did journalctl change to volatile without my knowledge?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL
  • From: Michael Schwendt
• Re: Review request
  • From: Bob Hepple
• FedoraRespin-32-updates-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• New rpmbuild failure - new rpm? Other?
  • From: Orion Poplawski
• Fedora-IoT-33-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• [Test-Announce] Call For Test Days for Fedora 33!
  • From: Sumantro Mukherjee
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200503.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-30-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Fedora-Cloud-32-20200503.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Ben Cotton
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Vít Ondruch
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Nicolas Mailhot via devel
• Fedora-Cloud-31-20200504.0 compose check report
  • From: Fedora compose checker
• Re: Fedora 33 Self-Contained Change proposal: Network Time Security
  • From: Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: José Abílio Matos
• Re: New set of questions for FESCo candidates?
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2020-05-04)
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Miro Hrončok
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Florian Weimer
• Re: error in spec file
  • From: Globe Trotter via devel
• Re: Announcing bugzilla overrides coming to dist-git (stg)
  • From: Pierre-Yves Chibon
• Re: Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Richard Shaw
• Is dist-git a good place for work?
  • From: Tomas Tomecek
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Fabio Valentini
• Re: OCaml packages in Rawhide are broken for long time
  • From: Jerry James
• Re: error in spec file
  • From: Dinesh Prasanth Moluguwan Krishnamoorthy
• Orphaned maven-release
  • From: Markku Korkeala
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Jiri Vanek
• Re: Backports of fixes from F32 -> F31?
  • From: Alex Scheel
• Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Node.js 14.x by default
  • From: James Cassell
• Re: F33 system wide change, java-11-openjdk as system jdk
  • From: Iñaki Ucar