On 02/06/20 07:54 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
Is the rebuild in the side tag something that's still in progress? I sent Jonathan an email asking, but didn't get a reply.
Sorry, I didn't see the mail until today. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F33Boost173#Scope links to the ticket for the side tag, which is https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9474 and that makes it clear the tag is still active.
I've built a new release of ceph (ceph-15.2.3) in the f33-boost side tag but if this is something that's on hold I'll need to build it for f33.
Thanks. ceph was not in my list, because it isn't returned by the first query shown at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F33Boost173#Dependencies Does it actually depend on any libboost_*.so libraries, or just use the header-only libraries? If it only uses the header-only parts it doesn't necessarily need to be rebuilt (there won't be broken deps when the previous boost release gets replaced in the rawhide repo, although it's possible that other things that link to ceph or that ceph links to will have been rebuilt, which can cause problems). Hmm, I do see this in ceph.spec: BuildRequires: boost-devel BuildRequires: boost-random But the repoquery doesn't say it needs them. Generally, I only use the side tag to rebuild things that will get broken deps if they aren't rebuilt. Other packages can be rebuilt after the side tag is merged, or by the mass rebuild that will happen in a few weeks. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx