Or just a new option to rpmbuild that skips %check ? Sent from my iPhone > On Jun 5, 2020, at 10:11, Tomas Orsava <torsava@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi, > I think it would be useful to have a standard way of disabling the running of tests during RPM build (in the %check section of a spec file). > > I see a lot of packages already having %bcond's or other macro definitions to archieve this, but each package has their own way, there's no real standard. Thus you have to first look into the spec, locate the appropriate %bcond or macro name and only then you can disable the tests. > > I would like to propose two approaches: > > (a) Add a *SHOULD* rule to the guidelines that specifies what is the preferred way to conditionalize the tests. > > (b) Or, if that's too strong, mention in the guidelines the common methods that are being used (e.g. %bcond tests and %bcond check) so that new packagers have something to use. > > What do you think? > Tomas > _______________________________________________ > packaging mailing list -- packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > To unsubscribe send an email to packaging-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx