On Fri, 2020-06-05 at 19:31 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: > * Ben Cotton: > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CompilerPolicy > > > > == Summary == > > Fedora has historically forced packages to build with GCC unless the > > upstream project for the package only supported Clang/LLVM. This > > change proposal replaces that policy with one where compiler selection > > for Fedora follows the package's upstream preferences. > > Jeff, would you please clarify in the proposal that libc++ is out of > scope (as already discussed)? Yes. I haven't replied to that part of the thread yet. But yes, libc++ is out of scope. It'd be a compatibility nightmare. > > What about compiler-rt? And lld? Any other LLVM subprojects that could > be relevant? I consider those out of scope as well :-) I think there's some desire to add lld into the alternatives mechanism (along side ld.bfd and ld.gold). But that's about it to the best of my knowledge. jeff _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
