On Friday, June 5, 2020 12:16:36 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > On Fri, Jun 5, 2020 at 1:10 PM John M. Harris Jr <johnmh@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > > > > > On Friday, June 5, 2020 12:03:03 PM MST Chris Murphy wrote: > > > > > > In discussions with both cloud and server folks, their use cases often > > > do not even create disk-based swap at all. A small swap-on-zram > > > provides all the benefits of inactive anonymous page eviction, > > > including reducing reclaim of file pages, without the black hole > > > performance problems of swap-on-drive. > > > > > > > > > > > > So yes it's well suited for these cases and the proposal does include > > > them. If they wish to be left out, that's up to those working groups. > > > It's possible to make sure /etc/systemd/zram-generator is not present. > > > > > > > > That doesn't seem to reflect reality. If you download the Server image > > right now, and go with its automatic partitioning scheme generation, > > it'll give you a swap partition on LVM. This is correct for most servers, > > not necessarily the LVM part, but having swap on disk. > > > The proposal recommends changing this. Cloud and Server folks will > decide what's best for their use cases, not me. In that case, would you be open to changing this proposal to only affect Workstation? -- John M. Harris, Jr. _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
