On Fri, Jun 05, 2020 at 09:52:09AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote: > I do not see why we should allow yet another special case for Firefox, nor > why we should let random packages make their own choice of compiler and risk > running into hidden binary incompatibilities. We have a system compiler for > a reason. I'll note that there are some even not really hidden binary incompatibilities, where LLVM diverges from the psABI for years, it has been reported and nothing has been changed. So if a library is built with clang/LLVM and used by GCC built package or vice versa, one might very well run into those (this is e.g. about passing std::byte or other scoped enums with char/short underlying type by value, or in some cases even about passing char/short arguments). And of course unknown ABI bugs on both sides. Jakub _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
