On 02/06/20 10:44 -0400, Kaleb Keithley wrote:
On Tue, Jun 2, 2020 at 10:25 AM Jonathan Wakely <jwakely@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
...
ceph was not in my list, because it isn't returned by the first query
shown at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F33Boost173#Dependencies
Does it actually depend on any libboost_*.so libraries, or just use
the header-only libraries? If it only uses the header-only parts it
doesn't necessarily need to be rebuilt (there won't be broken deps
when the previous boost release gets replaced in the rawhide repo,
although it's possible that other things that link to ceph or that
ceph links to will have been rebuilt, which can cause problems).
Hmm, I do see this in ceph.spec:
BuildRequires: boost-devel
BuildRequires: boost-random
But the repoquery doesn't say it needs them.
Up to now it hasn't.
I've been waiting to get boost > 1.71 so that it can be built with the
system boost instead of its bundled copy.
If the side tag build is going to be going on for a while then I'm going to
rebuild it for f33 with boost-1.69, and/but I will also build it again with
higher NVR for f33-boost.
The side tag is merging right now, you just have to wait for 100+
packages to be signed, and they'll be in rawhide.
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
