Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 01. 06. 20 23:10, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> It was actually a bit tricky to come up with a solution for this. I
>> hacked up a minimal reproducer with empty packages, and experimented a
>> bit, and the solution I was able to find that works is to have systemd-
>> udev Obsoletes: systemd < 245.6-1. This seems to correctly clue DNF in
>> to the situation and cause it to leave out anything from 245.4-1.fc32
>> in the upgrade.
>
> IMO this is the "correct" solution to the problem. Thanks.
The correct solution is to actually fix DNF. It MUST NOT take Obsoletes from
outdated versions of packages (i.e., when there is a newer version in the
repository which removes the Obsoletes) into account.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
