IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about"URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about"URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Additional Last Call: RFC-to-be 6478, previously draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10.txt (Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires) to Proposed Standard
- FW: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-09.txt
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- Re: Post-RFC1480 .us TLD
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: lmap -- Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-05
- Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-05
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- RFC 6410 errata
- RE: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-25
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-03
- FW: New Version Notification - draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-04.txt
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-25
- CALL FOR CANDIDATES FOR ITOJUN SERVICE AWARD
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Post-RFC1480 .us TLD
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05
- Re: Please check this idea
- RFC Server Outage Report
- Please check this idea
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- From: Simon Pietro Romano
- Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-06
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Call for Nominations: Applied Networking Research Prize 2012
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-3517bis-02
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- IETF 83 Operations and Administration Plenary Minutes
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- IETF Journal v7.3 now available
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- RE: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: [conex] Last Call: <draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> (ConEx Concepts and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- From: marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- RE: IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- Fwd: IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- Re: [conex] Last Call: <draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> (ConEx Concepts and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- Re: [conex] Last Call: <draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> (ConEx Concepts and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- Re: ZOOM://IETF.Fact.Check "Improving HTTP starts with speed."
- Re: ZOOM://IETF.Fact.Check "Improving HTTP starts with speed."
- Re: ZOOM://IETF.Fact.Check "Improving HTTP starts with speed."
- ZOOM://IETF.Fact.Check "Improving HTTP starts with speed."
- ZOOM://IETF.Fact.Check ? 2012 State of the Art according to the ISOC ?
- Re: Meetecho support fot Plenary session
- From: Meetecho IETF support
- IETF.FACT.CHECK ....839 new Top Level Domains or more...plus the DIRTY.BIT
- IETF.Fact.Check on the ZOOM://BOX Protocol(s)
- IETF.Fact.Check on the ZOOM:// Scheme and ZOOM://BOX Architecture and the Inter.NOT
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check - .COM .NET .ORG Legacy DNS vs Peer-2-Peer DNS
- IETF.Fact.Check - .COM .NET .ORG Legacy DNS vs Peer-2-Peer DNS
- response set assertions and extensions
- Re: IAB responds to ICANN questions concerning "The interpretation of rules in the ICANN gTLD applicant guidelines"
- Meetecho support fot Plenary session
- From: Meetecho IETF support
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- IAB responds to ICANN questions concerning “The Interpretation of Rules in the ICANN gTLD Guidebook”
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- OMA IETF MIF API Workshop - Room info
- Re: Anti-Trust Policy BOF tomorrow
- Re: Fact.Check IETF Meeting - Paris, France - 100/8 IANA
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- Anti-Trust Policy BOF tomorrow
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- Re: Technical Plenary Captioned
- Re: Fact.Check IETF Meeting - Paris, France - 100/8 IANA
- Re: Fact.Check IETF Meeting - Paris, France - 100/8 IANA
- Technical Plenary Captioned
- Fact.Check IETF Meeting - Paris, France - 100/8 IANA
- Re: Fact.Check IETF Meeting - 1460 registrations:
- Re: Fact.Check IETF Meeting - Paris, France - Internet Engineering
- Fact.Check IETF Meeting - Paris, France - Internet Engineering
- Re: Fact.Check IETF Meeting - 1460 registrations:
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- Fact.Check IETF Meeting - 1460 registrations:
- RE: FW: LastCall:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationofan Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) toInformational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-08.txt> (AnOverviewoftheOAM Tool Set for MPLS based Transport Networks) toInformational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dnsext-rfc2671bis-edns0-08.txt> ... to Full Standard
- Re: [Ietf-krb-wg] Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04.txt> (Deprecate DES, RC4-HMAC-EXP, and other weak cryptographic algorithms in Kerberos) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-08.txt> (An Overviewofthe OAM Tool Set for MPLS based Transport Networks) toInformational RFC
- RE: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- RE: [PWE3] FW: LastCall: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: [PWE3] FW: LastCall: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: FW: LastCall:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationofan Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) toInformational RFC
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: FW: LastCall:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationofan Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) toInformational RFC
- Re: [PWE3] FW: LastCall: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: IPR requirements in document write-up
- Re: [PWE3] FW: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-08.txt> (An Overviewofthe OAM Tool Set for MPLS based Transport Networks) toInformational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-08.txt> (An Overviewof the OAM Tool Set for MPLS based Transport Networks) toInformational RFC
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: FW: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-krb-wg-des-die-die-die-04.txt> (Deprecate DES, RC4-HMAC-EXP, and other weak cryptographic algorithms in Kerberos) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-08.txt> (An Overview of the OAM Tool Set for MPLS based Transport Networks) to Informational RFC
- FW: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-08.txt> (An Overviewof the OAM Tool Set for MPLS based Transport Networks) toInformational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- OMA IETF MIF API Workshop
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Journals at the IETF - calling all contributors!
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-08.txt> (An Overview of the OAM Tool Set for MPLS based Transport Networks) to Informational RFC
- R: RE: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- From: erminio.ottone_69@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- RE: הנדון: RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: הנדון: RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: [PWE3] FW: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: [AVTCORE] IPR requirements in document write-up
- RE: [AVTCORE] IPR requirements in document write-up
- Re: [AVTCORE] IPR requirements in document write-up
- Re: [AVTCORE] IPR requirements in document write-up
- Re: [AVTCORE] IPR requirements in document write-up
- RE: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- RE: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: הנדון: RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- From: D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
- R: הנדון: RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- From: D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
- R: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- From: D'Alessandro Alessandro Gerardo
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocationof anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T EthernetbasedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>
- Re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: URIs and zone IDs
- UMPIRE moderation experiments at IETF83
- From: Simon Pietro Romano
- URIs and zone IDs (was: Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful)
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationofan Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T EthernetbasedOAM) to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationofan Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T EthernetbasedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-09
- Re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- RE: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard
- VS: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- FW: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Beer and Gear
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- RE: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- RE: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationofan Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T EthernetbasedOAM) to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- RE: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt> (The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)) to Experimental RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-reschke-http-status-308-05.txt> (The Hypertext Transfer Protocol (HTTP) Status Code 308 (Permanent Redirect)) to Experimental RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Trade show at IETF
- Trade show at IETF
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the"X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Bad ABNF
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Bad ABNF
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: SIDR WG Virtual Interim Meeting, March 24, 2012
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the"X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: SIDR WG Virtual Interim Meeting, March 24, 2012
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- RE: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- RE: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- RE: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- From: Marc Petit-Huguenin
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: IETF Mail Archive Tools RFI
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: IETF Mail Archive Tools RFI
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- RE: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: [83attendees] Usual recreational venue diatribe (was Ground transportation from/to CDG)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- New ITS email list for discussing IPv6 and vehicular communications
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- RE: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- RE: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Re: Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- Issues relating to managing a mailing list...
- RE: [PWE3] FW: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM)to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [IETF] Re: shared address space... a reality!
- Re: Paris IETF Codesprint
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: shared address space... a reality!
- Re: [83attendees] Usual recreational venue diatribe (was Ground transportation from/to CDG)
- From: Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: GenART last call review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03
- Re: הנדון: RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: shared address space... a reality!
- RE: הנדון: RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- RE: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM) toInformational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: shared address space... a reality!
- Re: shared address space... a reality!
- RE: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the"X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the"X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-09
- הנדון: RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- RE: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-bmwg-protection-meth-09.txt> (Methodology for benchmarking MPLS protection mechanisms) to Informational RFC
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard
- GenART last call review of draft-ietf-behave-nat64-learn-analysis-03
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the"X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- IETF Mail Archive Tools RFI
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05
- Re: Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05
- Gen-ART LC/Telechat review of draft-reschke-http-status-308-05
- Re: [PWE3] FW: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernet based OAM) to Informational RFC
- IETF83 Audio Streaming info
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [OAUTH-WG] Last Call: <draft-ietf-oauth-v2-bearer-15.txt> (The OAuth 2.0 Authorization Protocol: Bearer Tokens) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [lisp] WG Review: Recharter of Locator/ID Separation Protocol (lisp)
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- RE: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- RE: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- RE: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-03
- Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- Fwd: Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-pw-typed-wc-fec-03.txt> (LDP Typed Wildcard FEC for PWid and Generalized PWid FEC Elements) to Proposed Standard
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (DeprecatingUse of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to BestCurrent Practice
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [IETF] Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: [IETF] Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt>
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt>
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-xdash-03.txt> (Deprecating Use of the "X-" Prefix in Application Protocols) to Best Current Practice
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-03
- RE: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: WG Review: INtermediary-safe SIP session ID (insipid)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-snell-atompub-tombstones-15.txt> (The Atom "deleted-entry" Element) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- RE: tsv-dir review of draft-garcia-shim6-applicability-03
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: [IETF] Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Add a link to the HTML version in i-d-announce mails ?
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of anAssociated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt>(Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use byITU-T Ethernetbased OAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- RE: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: field types, was provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocationof an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T EthernetbasedOAM) to Informational RFC
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-melnikov-smtp-priority-07.txt> (Simple Mail Transfer Protocol extension for Message Transfer Priorities) to Proposed Standard
- Re: field types, was provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call:<draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-03.txt> (Allocation of an Associated Channel Code Point for Use by ITU-T Ethernet basedOAM) to Informational RFC
- Re: field types, was provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
- Re: provisioning software, was DNS RRTYPEs, the difficulty with
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]