IETF Discussion
[Prev Page][Next Page]
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-farrresnickel-ipr-sanctions-05.txt> (Sanctions Available for Application to Violators of IETF IPR Policy) to Informational RFC
- Finally, It's The Year Of Linux^H^H^H^H^HIPv6
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- RE: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- a favor from the list about Jon Postel
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays]
- RE: [Fwd: IETF posting delays]
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays]
- Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays]
- Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Fwd: IETF posting delays]
- Re: Gender diversity in engineering
- [Fwd: IETF posting delays]
- RE: Gender diversity in engineering
- RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: [IETF] Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Last Call: <draft-kucherawy-marf-source-ports-03.txt> (Source Ports in ARF Reports) to Proposed Standard
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: IETF posting delays
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: IETF posting delays
- IETF posting delays
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- Re: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Gender diversity in engineering
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- RE: Gender diversity in engineering
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Gender diversity in engineering
- Re: Gender diversity in engineering
- RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- RE: Last Call: <draft-levine-application-gzip-02.txt> (The application/zlib and application/gzip media types) to Informational RFC
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- IETF Trust Minutes since August 2011
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Mailing list for LGBTQ participants in the IETF
- Re: Mailing list for IETF women
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Mailing list for IETF women
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Gender diversity in engineering
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Gender diversity in engineering
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- Gender diversity in engineering
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Scared away from tech industry?
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [IETF] Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-codec-opus-12.txt> (Definition of the Opus Audio Codec) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [Gen-art] Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10
- Re: Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10
- Re: Last Call: <draft-polk-ipr-disclosure-03.txt> (Promoting Compliance with Intellectual Property Rights (IPR) Disclosure Rules) to Informational RFC
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- FW: I-D Action: draft-sprecher-mpls-tp-oam-considerations-03.txt
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- RE: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- Re: 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry ? The Register
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- 'Geek' image scares women away from tech industry • The Register
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Re: Is the IETF aging?
- Is the IETF aging?
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10
- Re: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- From: Joe Pelissier (jopeliss)
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- From: Joe Pelissier (jopeliss)
- RE: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 25-Apr-2012 update
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt>
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- RE: [MBONED] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard
- RE: [PWE3] Last Call: <draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-bit-06.txt> (Pseudowire Preferential Forwarding Status Bit) to Proposed Standard
- From: Aissaoui, Mustapha (Mustapha)
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- Re: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations
- From: Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: [IAOC] IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets]
- Re: IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets]
- RE: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- RE: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- RE: [nvo3] Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN
- RE: IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets]
- IAOC and permissions [Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets]
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- NVO3 Charter Review
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> - Referring to the DANE protocol and DANE-denoted certificate associations
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN
- Re: Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Key difference between DCVPN and L2VPN/L3VPN
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Questions: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Nits: WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 updates
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions
- RE: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- GenART LC review of draft-ietf-mboned-mcaddrdoc-03
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- From: Ersue, Mehmet (NSN - DE/Munich)
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: [secdir] secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Fwd: New: Information-Centric Networking Research Group (ICNRG)
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Resolving last call comments on draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: [nvo3] WG Review: Network Virtualization Overlays (nvo3) - 23-Apr-2012 update
- RE: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: DRAGE, Keith (Keith)
- SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions
- Resolution of last call on draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- RE: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- From: Dearlove, Christopher (UK)
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Future Handling of Blue Sheets
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Romascanu, Dan (Dan)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mboned-64-multicast-address-format-01.txt> (IPv4-Embedded IPv6 Multicast Address Format) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions
- Re: SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions
- SMTP question - a session containing multiple transactions
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- RE: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Proposed IESG Statement on the Conclusion of Experiments
- Re: [apps-discuss] Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about" URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about"URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-appsawg-about-uri-scheme-04.txt> (The "about"URI Scheme) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: Additional Last Call: RFC-to-be 6478, previously draft-ietf-pwe3-static-pw-status-10.txt (Pseudowire Status for Static Pseudowires) to Proposed Standard
- FW: [mpls] I-D Action: draft-ietf-mpls-tp-oam-analysis-09.txt
- From: Sprecher, Nurit (NSN - IL/Hod HaSharon)
- Query to the community -- An additional IETF Meeting event?
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- secdir review of draft-ietf-emu-chbind-14
- Re: Post-RFC1480 .us TLD
- RE: New Non-WG Mailing List: lmap -- Large Scale Measurement of Access network Performance
- From: Henning Schulzrinne
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: [savi] Last Call: <draft-ietf-savi-dhcp-12.txt> (SAVI Solution for DHCP) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-05
- Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-05
- Re: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- Re: [dane] Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-dane-protocol-19.txt> (The DNS-Based Authentication of Named Entities (DANE) Protocol for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard
- From: Murray S. Kucherawy
- RE: Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- RFC 6410 errata
- RE: Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-25
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-ippm-rt-loss-03
- FW: New Version Notification - draft-betts-itu-oam-ach-code-point-04.txt
- Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-oauth-v2-25
- CALL FOR CANDIDATES FOR ITOJUN SERVICE AWARD
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Post-RFC1480 .us TLD
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-claise-export-application-info-in-ipfix-05
- Re: Please check this idea
- RFC Server Outage Report
- Please check this idea
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: Audio recordings for IETF 83
- From: Simon Pietro Romano
- Audio recordings for IETF 83
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: GenART review of draft-ietf-pwe3-redundancy-06
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Call for Nominations: Applied Networking Research Prize 2012
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-tcpm-3517bis-02
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- IETF 83 Operations and Administration Plenary Minutes
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- IETF Journal v7.3 now available
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- Re: IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- IPv6 networking: Bad news for small biz
- From: Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- RE: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- From: Worley, Dale R (Dale)
- RE: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- From: Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- RE: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- Gen-ART review of draft-johansson-loa-registry-04
- Re: IPv6 Zone Identifiers Considered Hateful
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: RFC 6592 on The Null Packet
- From: Riccardo Bernardini
- Re: Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-ancp-pon-02
- Evil bit (RFC3514) finally implemented
- Re: [conex] Last Call: <draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> (ConEx Concepts and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
- From: marcelo bagnulo braun
- Re: IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- From: JORDI PALET MARTINEZ
- RE: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- RE: IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- Re: IETF.Fact.Check IETF Participants that were also at ICANN Costa Rica Meeting ?
- Fwd: IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- IETF attendees reengineer their hotel's Wi-Fi network
- Re: [conex] Last Call: <draft-ietf-conex-concepts-uses-04.txt> (ConEx Concepts and Use Cases) to Informational RFC
[Index of Archives]
[IETF Announcements]
[IETF]
[IP Storage]
[Yosemite News]
[Linux SCTP]
[Linux Newbies]
[Fedora Users]