Joe Touch wrote:
>> While your draft is rather harmful than useless, I'm fine
>> if the following point of the draft:
>>
>> >> Originating sources MAY set the IPv4 ID field of atomic
>> datagrams to any value.
>>
>> is changed to:
>>
>> >> Originating sources MUST set the IPv4 ID field of atomic
>> datagrams to values as unique as possible.
>>
>> which is what the current BSD implementations do.
>
> There are implementations that set DF=1 and ID=0 (cellphones).
They are broken implementations violating RFC791.
To quote from RFC1122:
1.2 General Considerations
There are two important lessons that vendors of Internet host
software have learned and which a new vendor should consider
seriously.
1.2.2 Robustness Principle
At every layer of the protocols, there is a general rule whose
application can lead to enormous benefits in robustness and
interoperability [IP:1]:
"Be liberal in what you accept, and
conservative in what you send"
The second part of the principle is almost as important:
software on other hosts may contain deficiencies that make it
unwise to exploit legal but obscure protocol features. It is
unwise to stray far from the obvious and simple, lest untoward
effects result elsewhere. A corollary of this is "watch out
for misbehaving hosts"; host software should be prepared, not
just to survive other misbehaving hosts, but also to cooperate
to limit the amount of disruption such hosts can cause to the
shared communication facility.
it is obvious that your draft violates the robustness principle.
> BSD does not make IDs as unique as possible; it selects them according
> to a pseudorandom algorithm that does not take into account the
> datagram's source IP, destination IP, or protocol. I.e., BSD code
> repeats the IDs more frequently than necessary when a host concurrently
> sources datagrams with different (srcIP, dstIP, proto) tuples.
You merely mean BSD code does not try to make ID unique for
the longest possible MSL and the fastest possible packet rate,
which is not my point.
As the uniqueness is broken at some MSL and rate anyway, the
current code is enough to be "as unique as possible".
Masataka Ohta