wfm On Jun 8, 2012, at 3:49 PM, Paul Hoffman wrote: > On Jun 8, 2012, at 12:46 PM, Bradner, Scott wrote: > >> just to be clear - saying "final appellate avenue in the standardization process". could be read as meaning >> that a appeal of a technical decision could be made to the ISOC Board and that is not the case - >> this is why I used different language >> >> not sure which you were supporting > > > I am supporting not putting anything about appeals to the ISOC Board in the Tao. They do not apply to novices. > > --Paul Hoffman >