I want to highlight one think in this document. The document says: There is an existing tool for supporting Nomcom work. The set of requirements specified in this document are mainly enhancement requirements or behavior changes to the existing tool. Unless otherwise stated all of the current functions of the existing Nomcom tool need to be supported in the new tool as well. If you have not served on a NomCom since the existing tool was deployed, then it will be difficult to understand the proposed tool requirements. Is this acceptable? Russ On Jun 13, 2012, at 12:04 PM, The IESG wrote: > The IESG has received a request from an individual submitter to consider > the following document: > - 'Requirements for IETF Nominations Committee tools' > <draft-krishnan-nomcom-tools-01.txt> as Informational RFC > > The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solicits > final comments on this action. Please send substantive comments to the > ietf@xxxxxxxx mailing lists by 2012-07-11. Exceptionally, comments may be > sent to iesg@xxxxxxxx instead. In either case, please retain the > beginning of the Subject line to allow automated sorting. > > Abstract > > This document defines the requirements for a set of tools for use by > the IETF Nominations Committee. > > The file can be obtained via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-nomcom-tools/ > > IESG discussion can be tracked via > http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-krishnan-nomcom-tools/ballot/ > > No IPR declarations have been submitted directly on this I-D.