fyi the applicability stmt version 00 was submitted by joe the other day. 19 jul 2012 kl. 13:19 skrev "Sam Hartman" <hartmans-ietf@xxxxxxx>: >>>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen Farrell <stephen.farrell@xxxxxxxxx> writes: > > Stephen> Sorry, I should've asked this before but I'm sometimes dumb:-) > > Stephen> If I put in an RFC editor note adding a normative reference > Stephen> to the new EAP applicability statement [1] would that sort > Stephen> this out and not cause any problems for anyone? > > I don't object to that, but it does hold up the doc. I'm happy letting > this doc go forward now so long as we're all on the same page on the > applicability stament. I realize we run the risk that somehow the > applicability effort derails. Personally, I'm willing to take that > risk, so long as we believe today we do intend to publish the > applicability statement. > > If someone on the IESG or in the community wants that normative > reference, I support adding it. I'm just not asking for it myself. > _______________________________________________ > abfab mailing list > abfab@xxxxxxxx > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/abfab