Re: [decade] FW: Last Call: <draft-farrell-decade-ni-07.txt> (Naming Things with Hashes) to Proposed Standard

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hello Stephen,

On 2012/06/12 20:08, Stephen Farrell wrote:

So would it work to add this:

"
    Note that relative ni URIs can occur, for example as shown in
    Figure 5.  In such cases, user agents MUST construct the absolute URI
    as they would in the case of an HTTP URL, that is, in the example
    shown the absolute URI for "this third document" would be
    "ni://example.com/sha-256-128;...".

This looks fine, except that it contains a MUST when it can just refer to RFC 3986. So I would suggest the following text:

   Note that relative ni URIs can occur. In such cases, the algorithm
   in Section 5 of RFC 3986 applies. As an example, in Figure 5, the
   absolute URI for "this third document" is
   "ni://example.com/sha-256-128;...".



      <html>
       <head>
         <title>ni: relative URI test</title>
         <base href="ni://example.com">
       </head>

       <body>
         <p>Please check<a href="sha-256;f4OxZX...">this document</a>.
           And<a href="sha-256;UyaQV...">this other document</a>.
           And<a href="sha-256-128;...">this third document</a>.
         </p>
       </body>
      </html>

                 Figure 5: Example HTML with relative ni URI

"

Better suggestions welcome.
Ta,

I tried to look "Ta" up on the Web, but there were just too many potential explanations. What are you using it for?


Regards,   Martin.

S.


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]