Hi Björn, On 06/08/2012 03:16 AM, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote: > I think the requirement in RFC 4395 section 2.6 applies here, there are > text fields in 'ni' and 'nih' addresses, so there needs to be some dis- > cussion about I18N and IRI issues, or a statement that there are none, > or something along those lines. What if I want a non-ASCII host name in > them, for instance? So what's reasonable here? We're inheriting some definitions (authority, unreserved & pct-encoded) from 3986 and I'd not like to break that, nor would I like something that doesn't work with most libraries. Any suggestions? Thanks, S.