RE: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-04

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexey Melnikov [mailto:alexey.melnikov@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Wednesday, June 13, 2012 3:47 AM
> To: apps-discuss@xxxxxxxx; draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls.all@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: ietf@xxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] APPSDIR review of draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-04
> 
> On 04/06/2012 20:01, Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> > I have been selected as the Applications Area Directorate reviewer
> for
> > this draft (for background on APPSDIR, please see
> >
> http://trac.tools.ietf.org/area/app/trac/wiki/ApplicationsAreaDirectora
> te
> > ).
> >
> > Please resolve these comments along with any other Last Call comments
> > you may receive. Please wait for direction from your document
> shepherd
> > or AD before posting a new version of the draft.  The review is not
> > copied to the IESG as the Last Call has not been announced yet.
> >
> > Document: draft-ietf-nea-pt-tls-04
> > Title: PT-TLS: A TCP-based Posture Transport (PT) Protocol
> > Reviewer: Alexey Melnikov
> > Review Date: June 4, 2012
> >
> > Summary: This document is almost ready for publication as a Proposed
> > Standard, although some [mostly] SASL related issues remain.
> >
> > This document specifies PT-TLS, a TCP-based Posture Transport (PT)
> > protocol.  The PT-TLS protocol carries the Network Endpoint
> > Assessment (NEA) message exchange under the protection of a Transport
> > Layer Security (TLS) secured tunnel.
> >
> > (Note, I've reviewed -04, but I think all of this still applies to -
> 05.)
> Additional issues in -05:
> 
> 1) I didn't find the updated text prohibiting TLS renegotiation to be
> any clearer in -05? Can you maybe try to explain what is allowed and
> what is not?

[PS:] The editors will discuss this more and provide a response.

> 
> 2) In the IANA Considerations:
> 
> The PEN 0 (IETF) PT-TLS Message Type values between 9 and 2^32-2
> inclusive are allocated for future assignment by the IANA.  The value
> 2^32-1 is permanently reserved and is not to be allocated.
> 
> Whom does the last sentence apply to? This registry? Or the IANA PEN
> registry being documented by draft-liang-iana-pen?

[PS:] I'm assuming your asking about the text at the bottom of section 6.2. Registry for PT-TLS Message Types immediately below the table that defines registry values 0 thru 8 for PEN=0.  It refers to this specific registry not the PEN registry.




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]