> So perhaps if Randy's new suggested boilerplate could be added as > an erratum to 2119 yikes! i did not intend that. and i think folk need to look up 'erratum', think trivial bug fix. this would be a change. and i do not have the hubris to change sob's immortal words :) i think the practical problem my text may hit is id-nits and id nit pickers. two friends have warned me that i may have fun getting a draft through the iesg with it, and that i can look forward to silliness. my read of the iesg is that they have been taking a higher road these years. but we'll see. randy