> people. The annonced I-D lacks the method of discussion in the community
> (discussing such change), the draft mentions the input from any community
> individual to be accepted by editor and then approved by IESG, but does not
> mention the methodology of discussion between community members nor
> between editor and members, also no announcements of such updates
> mentioned in draft.
On this, as well as on the rest of the comments in the same message:
The IETF already has a process for discussion, review, and consensus, and this document neither changes any of it nor, I think, needs to repeat it.
Barry