RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances-11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



That works for me, Thanks, --David

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Worley, Dale R (Dale) [mailto:dworley@xxxxxxxxx]
> Sent: Friday, June 29, 2012 3:18 PM
> To: alan.b.johnston@xxxxxxxxx
> Cc: Black, David; mohsen.soroush@xxxxxxxxxxxx; ietf@xxxxxxxx; gen-
> art@xxxxxxxx; bliss@xxxxxxxx; vvenkatar@xxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances-11
> 
> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 20:05 -0500, Alan Johnston wrote:
> > >
> > > 4.1 - REQ-16:
> > >
> > >   in this case, seizing the line is the same thing as dialing.
> > >
> > > That seems wrong - I would have thought it was a "prerequisite" as
> > > opposed to "the same thing" because seizing the line is immediately
> > > followed by a dialing request.
> >
> >
> > This requirement is about sending one request that causes both actions
> > to occur.  In a PSTN ringdown circuit (a very specialized circuit,
> > used for "hotlines"), the two operations are the same thing.  Besides
> > this statement, is REQ-16 itself not clear?  Perhaps I should just
> > remove this statement if it adds confusion rather than clarity to the
> > requirement.
> 
> IMHO, a good fix is:
> 
>    REQ-16 The mechanism should support a way for a UA to seize a
>    particular appearance number and also send the request at the same
>    time.  This is needed when an automatic ringdown feature (a telephone
>    configured to immediately dial a phone number when it goes off hook)
>    is combined with shared appearances - in this case, seizing the line
>    is >>>integrated with<<< dialing.
> 
> Dale




[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]