Hi Andreas,
At 06:41 11-07-2012, Andreas Petersson wrote:
How is it "random bits of information" when the specifications says
that it MUST be underscore?
As far as I can think of, the only thing that it will tell is that the
implementation is following this specification.
So, on the contrary; the more "degrees of freedom" that is given to the
implementation, the easier it would be to do fingerprinting.
I could use a hash. If the hash has to begin with an underscore, I
have to reserve storage space for it. The ease for fingerprinting
depends on how Section 6.3 is implemented (see reference I posted on
WG mailing list about browser identification). I am ok if you want
to keep the requirement.
Regards,
-sm