Re: Comments for <I-D of Publishing the "Tao of the IETF" as a Web Page>

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Russ,

I agree with the proposal totally, but my confusions are: a) if we are
having the current document RFC4677 on the Tao-web, could we not
obsolete the RFC4677 until we get a final updated agreed RFC other
than the submitted I-D, Or the first web-document approved to obsolete
the RFC4677.
b) If we are making a new IETF web-document process, could we have the
I-D submited to include how the community will decide and how the
editor will decide.

sorry for any disturb,

Abdussalam
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
From: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com>
To: IETF <ietf at ietf.org>
Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:08:40 -0400

This URL <http://www.ietf.org/tao> will bring up the current document.
 It works exactly the same as <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html>.

This means that <http://www.ietf.org/tao/archive> cannot be used as
suggested on this thread.

I propose the following URLs for the Tao:

   - current Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html>

   - draft Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-possible-revision.html>

   - archive entries: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-archive/tao-YYYYMMDD.html>

Russ


[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]