Hi Russ, I agree with the proposal totally, but my confusions are: a) if we are having the current document RFC4677 on the Tao-web, could we not obsolete the RFC4677 until we get a final updated agreed RFC other than the submitted I-D, Or the first web-document approved to obsolete the RFC4677. b) If we are making a new IETF web-document process, could we have the I-D submited to include how the community will decide and how the editor will decide. sorry for any disturb, Abdussalam ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ From: Russ Housley <housley at vigilsec.com> To: IETF <ietf at ietf.org> Date: Thu, 21 Jun 2012 17:08:40 -0400 This URL <http://www.ietf.org/tao> will bring up the current document. It works exactly the same as <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html>. This means that <http://www.ietf.org/tao/archive> cannot be used as suggested on this thread. I propose the following URLs for the Tao: - current Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao.html> - draft Tao: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-possible-revision.html> - archive entries: <http://www.ietf.org/tao-archive/tao-YYYYMMDD.html> Russ