IETF Discussion

Date Index

[Prev Page][Next Page]

Re: What I've been wondering about the DMARC problem, (continued)
- Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists, Michael Richardson
- Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists, Hector Santos
- Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists, Theodore Ts'o
  - Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists, Miles Fidelman
    - Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists, Mark Andrews
- Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists, Hector Santos
SDN and Routing Protocols, Abhishek Verma
- Re: SDN and Routing Protocols, Scott Brim
Request for Feedback on RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations, IAB Chair
Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, S Moonesamy
- Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, S Moonesamy
  - Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Stephen Farrell
    - Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, S Moonesamy
  - Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Jari Arkko
    - Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, S Moonesamy
      - Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Jari Arkko
        
        Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, S Moonesamy
  - Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Randy Bush
    - Re: Request for a code point assignment for ED25519 - draft-moonesamy-sshfp-ed25519-01, Stephen Farrell
DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Robin H. Johnson
- Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R Levine
  - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
    - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Brian E Carpenter
    - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Robin H. Johnson
      - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Crocker
      - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Hector Santos
    - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton
      - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, ned+ietf
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John C Klensin
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John C Klensin
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John C Klensin
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John C Klensin
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Pete Resnick
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Hector Santos
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Pete Resnick
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives, John Levine
        
        RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
        
        RE: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives, John R Levine
        
        Re: protecting the Internet from DMARC damage, was perspectives, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, tytso
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: (DMARC) How a whitelist would work, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Pete Resnick
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Pete Resnick
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Pete Resnick
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, ned+ietf
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, ned+ietf
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Martin Rex
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Douglas Otis
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Martin Rex
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Martin Rex
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, tytso
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, tytso
        
        [off-off-track] Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Douglas Otis
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, Alessandro Vesely
        
        Re: (DMARC) We've been here before, was Why mailing lists, John Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, John Levine
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Martin Rex
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Yoav Nir
        
        RE: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: (DMARC) Why mailing lists are only sort of special, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Doug Barton
        
        Message not available
        
        RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Mailman 2.1.16 [DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Douglas Otis
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Cridland
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
        
        RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
        
        Message not available
        
        Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists), S Moonesamy
        
        RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists), MH Michael Hammer (5304)
        
        Message not available
        
        RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists), S Moonesamy
        
        Re: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists), Dave Cridland
        
        RE: Let's talk (was: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists), MH Michael Hammer (5304)
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Scott Kitterman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Scott Kitterman
        
        RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, l.wood
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
      - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, ned+ietf
  - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Robin H. Johnson
    - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R Levine
  - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, ned+ietf
    - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
      - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R Levine
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Alessandro Vesely
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Hector Santos
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Hector Santos
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Alessandro Vesely
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Hector Santos
        
        RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, MH Michael Hammer (5304)
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
      - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Hector Santos
        
        Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, S Moonesamy
    - RE: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Alex Ojeda
    - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Murray S. Kucherawy
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, John R. Levine
  - Re: DMARC: perspectives from a listadmin of large open-source lists, Miles Fidelman
Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07, Peter Yee
Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, John Levine
- Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Brian E Carpenter
- Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Sabahattin Gucukoglu
- Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, S Moonesamy
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Eric Dynamic
  - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, S Moonesamy
    - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Message not available
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, S Moonesamy
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Eric Dynamic
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Yoav Nir
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Avri Doria
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Randy Bush
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Douglas Otis
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Douglas Otis
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Eric Dynamic
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Fred Baker (fred)
        
        Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Phillip Hallam-Baker
- Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Doug Ewell
  - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Douglas Otis
  - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Ted Lemon
  - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Scott Kitterman
    - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Douglas Otis
  - Re: Yahoo breaks every mailing list in the world including the IETF's, Hector Santos
Re: Comments from the IAB on NISTIR 7977, Abdussalam Baryun
New TLDs and software, Jari Arkko
Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, David Morris
  - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, Ray Pelletier
- Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, Dave Crocker
  - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, Ray Pelletier
    - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, John C Klensin
      - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, John Levine
      - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Ray Pelletier
        
        Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, cdel.firsthand.net
        
        Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, John Levine
        
        CD-ROMs and secure access (was: Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark), John C Klensin
        
        Re: CD-ROMs and secure access (was: Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark), Mikael Abrahamsson
        
        Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Ray Pelletier
    - Re: Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, John Levine
  - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, Pranesh Prakash
- Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Abdussalam Baryun
  - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Ray Pelletier
  - RE: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Abdussalam Baryun
    - RE: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Ole Jacobsen
      - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees’ Intent to Renounce “IETF Secretariat” Trademark, Hector Santos
  - Re: Community Input Requested on Trustees' Intent to Renounce "IETF Secretariat" Trademark, Abdussalam Baryun
Security for various IETF services, Stephen Farrell
- RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
  - RE: Security for various IETF services, Randall Gellens
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, Fred Baker (fred)
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Fred Baker (fred)
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Randall Gellens
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Douglas Otis
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Fred Baker (fred)
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Randy Bush
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Randy Bush
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stewart Bryant
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Randall Gellens
        
        Message not available
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stephen Farrell
    - RE: Security for various IETF services, ned+ietf
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, ned+ietf
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dick Franks
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, t.p.
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Ted Lemon
- Re: Security for various IETF services, Pranesh Prakash
  - Re: Security for various IETF services, Randall Gellens
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, John C Klensin
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, Pranesh Prakash
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, John C Klensin
- Re: Security for various IETF services, Scott Brim
- Re: Security for various IETF services, Hector Santos
  - Re: Security for various IETF services, Dick Franks
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, Hector Santos
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Dick Franks
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Martin Thomson
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Hector Santos
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dick Franks
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stephen Farrell
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stewart Bryant
  - Re: Security for various IETF services, Stewart Bryant (stbryant)
    - RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, ned+ietf
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, Tim Bray
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Stewart Bryant
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Brian Trammell
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, John C Klensin
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stewart Bryant
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Martin Rex
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, Eric Gray
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Spencer Dawkins
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, t.p.
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dick Franks
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stephen Farrell
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Yoav Nir
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stephen Farrell
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Yoav Nir
- Re: Security for various IETF services, Stephen Farrell
  - Re: Security for various IETF services, David Morris
    - RE: Security for various IETF services, Christian Huitema
      - RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Randy Bush
      - Re[2]: Security for various IETF services, mohammed serrhini
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Stewart Bryant
      - RE: Security for various IETF services, Matthew Kaufman (SKYPE)
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Scott Brim
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, S Moonesamy
  - RE: Security for various IETF services, l.wood
  - Re: Security for various IETF services, Stewart Bryant
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Security for various IETF services, Noel Chiappa
  - Re: Security for various IETF services, Phillip Hallam-Baker
  - Re: Security for various IETF services, Dave Crocker
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, Ted Lemon
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, Theodore Ts'o
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Tim Bray
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Steve Crocker
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Mark Andrews
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Theodore Ts'o
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Jelte Jansen
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Stephen Kent
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: Security for various IETF services, Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: Security for various IETF services, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Security for various IETF services, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Web of trust at Internet Scale, Sam Hartman
Gen-ART LC review of draft-ietf-mpls-lsp-ping-ttl-tlv-07, Roni Even
An RFC7169 use case (!), Thierry Moreau
- Re: An RFC7169 use case (!), Sam Hartman
- Re: An RFC7169 use case (!), Ray Bellis
Re: RFC 7169 on The NSA (No Secrecy Afforded) Certificate Extension, Randy Bush
- RE: RFC 7169 on The NSA (No Secrecy Afforded) Certificate Extension, Leaf Yeh
  - Re: RFC 7169 on The NSA (No Secrecy Afforded) Certificate Extension, Al Arsenault
Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Andrew G. Malis
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ole Jacobsen
  - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ted Lemon
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Elwyn Davies
  - Message not available
    - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Tim Chown
  - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Randall Gellens
    - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Janet P Gunn
    - RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), l.wood
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Rgd.ietf
      - RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Randall Gellens
        
        RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), l.wood
        
        Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ted Lemon
        
        RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), l.wood
        
        RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Randall Gellens
        
        RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), l.wood
        
        RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Randall Gellens
        
        RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), l.wood
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), John Levine
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Rgd.ietf
  - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ole Jacobsen
    - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Chaitanya Dhareshwar
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Dale R. Worley
    - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Phillip Hallam-Baker
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Yoav Nir
        
        Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Elwyn Davies
        
        Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Suzanne Woolf
        
        Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Elwyn Davies
    - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Randall Gellens
      - RE: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), l.wood
        
        Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Dale R. Worley
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Clint Chaplin
  - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ted Lemon
    - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), John C Klensin
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Brian E Carpenter
        
        Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ted Lemon
      - Someone should do some work (was Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA)), Andrew Sullivan
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ted Lemon
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Randall Gellens
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Janet P Gunn
    - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Clint Chaplin
      - Re: RFC 7168 on The Hyper Text Coffee Pot Control Protocol for Tea Efflux Appliances (HTCPCP-TEA), Ted Lemon
IANA changes, IETF Chair
- IANA changes process, IETF Chair
  - Re: IANA changes process, Eliot Lear
    - Re: [Internetgovtech] IANA changes process, Miles Fidelman
    - Re: [Internetgovtech] IANA changes process, IETF Chair
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt, Black, David
- Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt, Donald Eastlake
  - RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt, Black, David
    - Re: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt, Donald Eastlake
      - RE: Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-trill-esadi-06.txt, Black, David
SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Kevin M. Gallagher
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Randy Bush
  - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Aronson
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Cridland
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Eliot Lear
  - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Ted Lemon
    - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Crocker
      - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Scott Brim
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos
        
        RE: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Christian Huitema
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin
        
        Mail System Reliability [was: Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header], Hector Santos
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos
      - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Ted Lemon
  - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, David Morris
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine
  - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine
      - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Phillip Hallam-Baker
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Ted Lemon
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John Levine
        
        Re[2]: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, mohammed serrhini
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Crocker
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Murray S. Kucherawy
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Randy Bush
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dave Cridland
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Michael Richardson
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, John C Klensin
        
        Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Phillip Hallam-Baker
    - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Randy Bush
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dale R. Worley
  - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Dick Franks
- Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos
  - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, David Morris
    - Re: SMTP RFC: "MUST NOT" change or delete Received header, Hector Santos
Re: [Recentattendees] ACTION: 2014 Meeting Venue Preference Survey, Eliot Lear
- Re: [Recentattendees] ACTION: 2014 Meeting Venue Preference Survey, Eliot Lear
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: [Recentattendees] ACTION: 2014 Meeting Venue Preference Survey, Ray Pelletier
Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Yaacov Weingarten
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Eric Osborne
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, George, Wes
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Pete Resnick
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, joel jaeggli
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Pete Resnick
  - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Randy Bush
    - Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, John Leslie
      - Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), Andrew Sullivan
        
        Re: Saying no, joel jaeggli
        
        Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), John Leslie
        
        Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), Ted Lemon
        
        Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), Abdussalam Baryun
        
        Re: Saying no (was: Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC), John C Klensin
- <Possible follow-ups>
- Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, George, Wes
  - RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-opsec-lla-only-07.txt> (Using Only Link-Local Addressing Inside an IPv6 Network) to Informational RFC, Gunter Van de Velde (gvandeve)
Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-ietf-netmod-ip-cfg-13, Peter Yee
Gen-ART Telechat review of draft-fairhurst-ipdvb-ule-iana-06, Peter Yee
RFC 5280/6818 - X.509v3 Name Constraints Inconsistency(?), Vyron Tsingaras
- Re: RFC 5280/6818 - X.509v3 Name Constraints Inconsistency(?), Russ Housley
RE: Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel
- Re: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Eric Osborne
  - RE: [mpls] Last Call: <draft-ietf-mpls-psc-updates-03.txt> (Updates to MPLS Transport Profile Linear Protection) to Proposed Standard, Adrian Farrel
Call for RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations, IAB Chair
- Reminder: Call for RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Nominations, IAB Chair
- RFC Series Oversight Committee (RSOC) Appointments, IAB Chair
two videos on WebRTC and security efforts, IETF Chair
- Re: two videos on WebRTC and security efforts, Hector Santos
Liaison Statement Improvements SOW for Community Input, IETF Administrative Director
- Re: Liaison Statement Improvements SOW for Community Input, Ray Pelletier
Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Abdussalam Baryun
- Re: Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Bjoern Hoehrmann
  - Re: Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Ted Lemon
    - Re: Marketing IETF drafts/projects ( was Re: IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, Eggert, Lars
IAOC Seeks Community Input on IETF Website Revamp SOW, mohammed serrhini
- Re: =?UTF-8?B?IElBT0MgU2Vla3MgQ29tbXVuaXR5IElucHV0IG9uIElFVEYgV2Vic2l0ZSBS?= =?UTF-8?B?ZXZhbXAgU09X?=, Michael Richardson
Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-multimob-pmipv6-source-08, Black, David
Gen-ART LC Review of draft-ietf-netext-pmip6-qos-11, Ben Campbell
Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Robert Sparks
- RE: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Adrian Farrel
  - Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Thomas Narten
    - Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Stewart Bryant
      - Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Thomas Narten
        
        Re: Gen-art LC review: draft-mahalingham-dutt-dcops-vxlan-08, Stewart Bryant
IETF Meeting Hotels Published Online, IETF Administrative Director
Comcast & NBCUniversal Make Long-Term Commitment to the IETF, IETF Administrative Director
Re: Last Call: <draft-ietf-idr-last-as-reservation-04.txt> (Reservation of Last Autonomous System (AS) Numbers) to Informational RFC, David Farmer
it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Tony Hansen
- Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, John Levine
  - RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, l.wood
    - RE: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, l.wood
  - Re: it's been a while since we discussed the use of PowerPoint in meetings, Phillip Hallam-Baker

[Index of Archives] [IETF Annoucements] [IP Storage] [Linux SCTP] [IETF]

Powered by Linux