> I think a "guaranteed not to publish p=reject" logo should be offered up by IETF as a branding mechanism. ... for expired internet-drafts. Lloyd Wood http://about.me/lloydwood ________________________________________ From: ietf [ietf-bounces@xxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Miles Fidelman [mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] Sent: 17 April 2014 01:40 To: ietf@xxxxxxxx Subject: Re: DMARC and yahoo MH Michael Hammer (5304) wrote: > > I think a "guaranteed not to publish p=reject" logo should be offered up by IETF as a branding mechanism. In fact, I like this idea so much I am going to have a designer friend of mine create it. IETF prominently in the middle with "guaranteed not to publish p=reject" around the perimeter of the circular logo. Participating mailbox providers could display it prominently on their websites and in their marketing materials. Just to be clear for anyone wanting to jump in claiming trademark infringement, this falls under the heading of parody - unless of course Y'all want to take the proposal seriously in which case you can have the logo. > > Can't tell if you're serious or not - but I like it :-) Kind of like "Best Viewed with Any Browser" Cheers, Miles -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra