-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 On 04/16/2014 03:23 AM, Michael Richardson wrote: > > So, as a WG chair, a person known to me just tried to post to the > list From a brand new yahoo.com mail account. They aren't > subscribed with that address. I would normally just approve, and > add them... > > It seems to me that I must now actually reject, because it would > affect other subscribers. > > I'm now thinking that we need to remove all the @yahoo.com > addresses from posting to ietf mailing lists. > This is probably obvious, but had gmail.com done what yahoo.com has done, that could I guess have a pretty significant impact on the IETF getting stuff done for a while since a lot of folks in the last few years seem to have migrated their IETF mail to gmail.com as a reasonable way to get around corporate this-and-that issues. Maybe people who've done that might want to consider whether its such a good plan for so many IETF participants to be dependent on just one service now that we have a demonstration that s/none/reject/ in one TXT RR can have such an impact. S. -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.14 (GNU/Linux) iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJTTle3AAoJEC88hzaAX42i7jQIALBIZ3Z+jp1RbGCiJp4IVztN qWa0aEUcx2Skp4gtM/vQnEEsCjYFAnRaoMofJqyUBuvTs3H0q/GMkcONcOPJW6wH R/HpKKr24UpYsfpdYKx99b7D27kVNgzML3e0bD3csR1MNC/yR7wvsnTHTwbv2mxk eb7O5Wp6kvKw/gRYjPHncMPSgBUyc+KixY6IDHzDk4IdCQP4CyVkhI4EV7dlu8nM T1RNhljdzCmJBLd0y1USS1UmKrPVhoFgBXShvnxabseqJN/m2bz5WVSuJgIwWRov duU5vRgbdQ5jTn9TBzEPdJ5LRbQczlHyLVdnjvOHApQ8HtNrQxKOe89C0b32+7A= =cS/m -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----