On Friday, April 25, 2014 02:26:22 Martin Rex wrote: ... > The DMARC policy scheme is actually censoring of a telecommunication > between a messge sender and a message receiver through a telecommunications > provider by some _outside_ third party. So in the US a p=reject DMARC > policy might potentially be freedom of speech (1st Amendment) violation. No idea about the rest of it, but this is nonsense. The 1st Amendment to the constitution is a restriction on government action, not on private action. See http://xkcd.com/1357/ . Scott K