Scott Kitterman wrote: > On Friday, April 25, 2014 02:26:22 Martin Rex wrote: >> >> The DMARC policy scheme is actually censoring of a telecommunication >> between a messge sender and a message receiver through a telecommunications >> provider by some _outside_ third party. So in the US a p=reject DMARC >> policy might potentially be freedom of speech (1st Amendment) violation. > > No idea about the rest of it, but this is nonsense. The 1st Amendment to the > constitution is a restriction on government action, not on private action. > See http://xkcd.com/1357/ . OK. I'm terribly sorry for you across the pond then. In the German constitution and in the European Human Rights Convention this is a basic right, and it protects not just from your own government, but also from private actors and other governments. -Martin