In message <5362B4C6.10904@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Miles Fidelman writes: > Dave Crocker wrote: > > On 5/1/2014 1:36 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > >> I'd like to understand the relationship of RFC 4846, which is > >> Informational, with RFC 5792/BCP 92 here. The latter gives IESG 5 > >> options for review of independent submissions for conflicts with the > >> IETF standards process, such as: > >> > >> 5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol > >> in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be > >> published without IETF review and IESG approval. > > > > Since DMARC does not extend any existing IETF protocol, how is that > > reference useful here? > > Sure looks to me like DMARC extends both SMTP and DNS. And DKIM. > Miles Fidelman > > -- > In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. > In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra > -- Mark Andrews, ISC 1 Seymour St., Dundas Valley, NSW 2117, Australia PHONE: +61 2 9871 4742 INTERNET: marka@xxxxxxx