Dave Crocker wrote:
On 5/1/2014 1:36 PM, Jim Fenton wrote:I'd like to understand the relationship of RFC 4846, which is Informational, with RFC 5792/BCP 92 here. The latter gives IESG 5 options for review of independent submissions for conflicts with the IETF standards process, such as: 5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be published without IETF review and IESG approval.Since DMARC does not extend any existing IETF protocol, how is that reference useful here?
Sure looks to me like DMARC extends both SMTP and DNS. Miles Fidelman -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra