On 5/1/2014 1:36 PM, Jim Fenton wrote: > I'd like to understand the relationship of RFC 4846, which is > Informational, with RFC 5792/BCP 92 here. The latter gives IESG 5 > options for review of independent submissions for conflicts with the > IETF standards process, such as: > > 5. The IESG has concluded that this document extends an IETF protocol > in a way that requires IETF review and should therefore not be > published without IETF review and IESG approval. Since DMARC does not extend any existing IETF protocol, how is that reference useful here? d/ -- Dave Crocker Brandenburg InternetWorking bbiw.net