On 4/15/2014 9:52 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Which does bring us back to the question of how to deal with "bad > actors" (or at least "irresponsible actors" or "uncooperative actors") > within a cooperative governance framework. Sigh.... Miles > Welcome to the club. I've been wondering about that same issue with regards to getting adoption of BCP38 for over a decade. :-) - ferg > Seth Johnson wrote: >> They're forcing adoption -- while folks have not been addressing this >> piece of the inter-governmental frame. :-) >> >> >> On Tue, Apr 15, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Miles Fidelman >> <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: >> >> Dave Crocker wrote: >> >> On 4/14/2014 6:45 PM, Brian E Carpenter wrote: >> >> I thought that standard operating procedure in the IT >> industry >> was: if you roll something out and it causes serious >> breakage to >> some of your users, you roll it back as soon as possible. >> >> Why hasn't Yahoo rolled back its 'reject' policy by now? >> >> >> >> As the most-recent public statement from Yahoo, this might >> have some tidbits in it that are relevant to your question: >> >> >> >> >> http://yahoo.tumblr.com/post/82426971544/an-update-on-our-dmarc-policy-to-protect-our-users >> >> >> >> You mean the part where they say: >> "We know there are about 30,000 affected email sending services, >> but we also know that the change needed to support our new DMARC >> policy is important and not terribly difficult to implement. We >> have detailed the changes we are requiring here >> >> <http://yahoomail.tumblr.com/post/82426900353/yahoo-dmarc-policy-change-what-should-senders-do>." >> >> >> I.e., 'not our problem' >> >> Miles Fidelman >> >> >> -- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. >> In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra >> >> > > -- Paul Ferguson VP Threat Intelligence, IID PGP Public Key ID: 0x54DC85B2