Re: DMARC from the perspective of the listadmin of a bunch of SMALL community lists

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 






On 14 April 2014 22:42, Miles Fidelman <mfidelman@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Big red disclaimer at the top then:
- THIS IS A DRAFT DISCUSSION MEMO
- THIS IS NOT A STANDARDS-TRACK SPECIFICATION
- THIS IS AN INDEPENDENT SUBMISSION, NOT AN IETF DOCUMENT
- SHOULD NOT BE USED AS THE BASIS FOR OPERATIONAL DEPLOYMENT OF PROTOCOL SOFTWARE


It doesn't matter. The fact that DMARC is an I-D at all is largely incidental.

If Yahoo had privately developed DMARC in a consortium under entirely different practice and operational rules than the IETF, where any participants in their mailing lists would have no clue how their contributions might be used, and without any review by the IETF as a whole, and then that consortium had published the result as an I-D, it'd be exactly the same situation as we are now.

Dave.

[Index of Archives]     [IETF Annoucements]     [IETF]     [IP Storage]     [Yosemite News]     [Linux SCTP]     [Linux Newbies]     [Fedora Users]