On 29 apr 2014, at 13:22, Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On the other hand, this will primarily cause direct problems to users/customers of the organisations that decide to do "p=reject" as their participation in mailing lists will be crippled. As Mikael says, this is a problem for people in those organisations that choose to have such filter policy together with the de-facto functionality of mailing lists out there. I ask myself as well what the problem is. If there was collateral damage on third parties, that would for me have been a different thing. As far as I see here, there is not. The damage is on the people that have chosen to have such policy (or customers of them). If I have completely misunderstood the situation, my apologies and I'll go back and re-read the flood of email on the topic... :-) Patrik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail